Garlic Breath, or What Not to Do on Your Opening Page

James Scott Bell Best Selling Suspense AuthorBy James Scott Bell

The opening page of your novel is your big introduction. It’s what an agent will read with most interest, to see if you can write (which is why page 1 is often the first thing read in your proposal. You may have spent 100 hours on a killer synopsis, 50 on an irresistible query, but if the writing itself is not up to snuff, the busy agent can save time by tossing the whole thing aside without reading the rest of the proposal).

Think of it this way. You are at a party and the man or woman of your dreams is across the room. The host offers to introduce you. You walk over. There is great anticipation, even from Dreamboat, who is there to meet people, too. So Dreamboat extends a hand, you take it, and say, “Nice to meet you.”

Only you have a horrendous case of garlic breath. Dreamboat winces, whips out a phone and walks quickly away, muttering, “I have to take this.”

Well, that’s what it’s like for an agent reading your first page. He or she wants to like you, but if you’ve got garlic breath, it’s all over. Bad first impression. See you later.

“If you cannot write a compelling opening scene, from the opening sentence, I’m not going to finish your proposal.”

- Agent, speaking at a recent writers conference

I taught at a writers conference recently, where attendees were invited to submit the opening page of their manuscripts - anonymously. We then put these on two transparencies. The first one as is, the second I had marked up as a tough editor might.

It was quite educational. I got 12 first pages in all, and none were ready for prime time. There were several items that should be avoided at all costs on the first page. Here they are, in no particular order:

Characters Alone, Thinking

This was in the majority of the first pages I reviewed. We did not get a scene, which is a character in conflict with others in order to advance an agenda. We got, instead, the ruminations of the character as he/she reflects on something that just happened, or the state of his/her life at the moment, or some strong emotion. The author, in a mistaken attempt to establish reader sympathy with the character, gave us static information.

Such a page is DOA, even if the character is “doing” something innocuous, like preparing breakfast:

Marge Inersha tried to mix the pancake batter, but thoughts of Carl kept swirling in her head, taking her mind off breakfast and back to Tuesday, horrible Tuesday when the sheriff had served her with the divorce papers. Tears fell into the batter, but Marge was powerless to stop them. She put the mixing bowl on the counter and wiped her eyes. How much more could she take? With two kids sleeping upstairs?

Marge is certainly hurting, but you know what? I don’t care. I hate to be piggy about this, but I really don’t care that Marge is crying into her pancake batter. The mistake writers make is in thinking that readers will have immediate sympathy for a person who is upset.

They won’t. It’s like sitting at a bar and guy next to you grabs your sleeve and immediately starts pouring out his troubles to you.

Sorry, buddy, I don’t care. We all got troubles. What else is new?

Don’t give us a character like that on page 1.

Dreams

Agents and editors hate it when you open with a dream. And so do most readers. Because if they get invested in a cool opening, and then discover it’s all been a dream, they feel cheated. So you may have a gripping first page, but you’ll ruin the effect when the character awakens.

Yes, I know some bestselling authors have done this. When you start selling a gazillion copies, you can do it, too. Until then, you can’t.

Exposition Dump

In most of the first pages I reviewed there was entirely too much exposition. The author thinks that this is information the reader has to know in order to understand the character and the scene.

In truth, readers need to know very little to get into the story. They will wait a long time for explanations and backstory if the action is gripping, essential, tense or disturbing. My rule, ever since I began writing and teaching, is act first, explain later.

This rule will serve you amazingly well your entire writing career.

Weather Without Character

Another complaint you’ll hear from editors and agents is about “weather openings.” This is a catch all phrase for generic description. Chip MacGregor, agent, described his opening pet peeve this way: “The [adjective] [adjective] sun rose in the [adjective] [adjective] sky, shedding its [adjective] light across the [adjective] [adjective] [adjective] land.”

If you’re gong to describe weather on the opening page, make sure you’ve established a character on whom the weather is acting. And make sure that character is not alone, thinking.

Point of View Confusion

Another big error was a confusion about Point of View. This comes in several guises.

1. We don’t have a strong POV character. Who does this scene belong to?

2. We “head hop” between different characters on the same page, losing focus.

3. We have the terrible sin of “collective POV.” That is, we get a description of two or more characters who think or perceive the same thing at the same time.

John and Mary ran from the gang, wondering where they were going to go next.

The 300 Spartans turned and saw the Persians approaching.

4. We have First Person narration without a compelling voice. First Person needs attitude.

5. We don’t have a POV at all until the second or third paragraph. We have description, but no idea who is perceiving it. We need that information right away.

So these are some very big don’t’ on your first page. Care to add more to the list?

And next time, I’ll tell you how to write an opening page that works . . .every time . . .in any genre . . .

James Scott Bell is a best selling suspense writer. A former trial lawyer, he was the fiction columnist for Writers Digest Magazine and an adjunct professor of writing at Pepperdine U. His books on the craft, Write Great Fiction: Plot & Structure, Write Great Fiction: Revision & Self-Editing, and The Art of War for Writers are 3 of the most popular writing books available today.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Garlic Breath, or What Not to Do on Your Opening Page”

  1. Joann Fuoss Says:

    Great informatuon…I recently had to decide on whether o not to keep a prologue. I’m glad I did after reading this…I decided to turn it into an appendix for the history and incorporated the necessary info into the book…I wasn’t sure about this decision until I read your article…Thanks…

  2. Al Kalar Says:

    I assume your prologue has some action in it and your first “real” chapter falls flat? If so, your “flat” chapter will need some work as well. One of my favorite quotes is, “grab the reader by the balls and don’t let go until the end”.

    Remember, the first chapter (or prologue) has to be a part of the overall problem that drives the plot. At least the “irritant” that drives the characters to the main problem. A prologue that’s written just to meet the requirement for a “grabber” start is “cheating”.

    Watch for Mr. Bell’s next article. It has some great information on how to write that first chapter. We’ll post it within a week or two.

  3. Samuel King Says:

    This blog and your response prompted two questions:

    1) Does the prologue in Hologram have POV confusion?

    2) Am I “cheating” to have a grabber scene in the prologue followed by a much calmer chapter one?

    I’d be interested in your thoughts.

  4. Al Kalar Says:

    “Hologram”???? Is that in our “house” somewhere?

    General answer: The best stories start off with a “grabber” and don’t let up until the end. Some can get by with “breather” scenes, but even those must contribute to the plot.

    A slow scene can be used to set up a later crisis, for instance. Some innocuous slight to another character may result in the slighted person going over to the other side and becoming a major problem during the story’s “big moment”. Some explanation of what’s going on may be necessary, but the best way to “explain” something is “on the run” with small “asides” or references that don’t interrupt the journey or action.

    Now, I’m not suggesting that every novel is an action yarn, but every story must move along and keep the reader interested. Long sections of expository writing is a huge turn-off unless you’re writing a history text. For fiction, you have to keep it going.

    My two-cents.

Leave a Reply