<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for How to Get Published</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog</link>
	<description>The art of story telling and marketing what you write</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best Novels are Emotional by John Bowers</title>
		<link>http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/2011/04/05/the-best-novels-are-emotional/#comment-6068</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/?p=1119#comment-6068</guid>
		<description>Yes, of course. How do you want to contact me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, of course. How do you want to contact me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The R Factor: Should Your Novel Contain Profanity? Part 1 by John Bowers</title>
		<link>http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/2011/05/24/the-r-factor-should-your-novel-contain-profanity-part-1/#comment-6067</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/?p=1142#comment-6067</guid>
		<description>You're right, Malcolm, I had forgot that. Now that you mention it, in the Firefly series they used the word "ruttin'" (rutting), which was a bit more obscure, but meant the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Malcolm, I had forgot that. Now that you mention it, in the Firefly series they used the word &#8220;ruttin&#8217;&#8221; (rutting), which was a bit more obscure, but meant the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The R Factor: Should Your Novel Contain Profanity? Part 1 by Malcolm Macdonald</title>
		<link>http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/2011/05/24/the-r-factor-should-your-novel-contain-profanity-part-1/#comment-6032</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Macdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/?p=1142#comment-6032</guid>
		<description>The use of 'frak' in BSG was hardly groundbreaking, bearing in mind that 'frack' appeared in the original series, although admittedly as a much milder expletive. Further, the word 'frell' was used in the earlier SyFy (actually, was it still the SciFi Channel at that point?!) series Farscape. And to cap it all, the use of 'firk' was used by Shakespeare! (There is nothing new under the Sun...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of &#8216;frak&#8217; in BSG was hardly groundbreaking, bearing in mind that &#8216;frack&#8217; appeared in the original series, although admittedly as a much milder expletive. Further, the word &#8216;frell&#8217; was used in the earlier SyFy (actually, was it still the SciFi Channel at that point?!) series Farscape. And to cap it all, the use of &#8216;firk&#8217; was used by Shakespeare! (There is nothing new under the Sun&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dialog Tags that Kill Your Story by John Bowers</title>
		<link>http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/2011/06/14/dialog-tags-that-kill-your-story/#comment-6018</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/?p=1169#comment-6018</guid>
		<description>Good advice. Hard to remember when the keyboard is smoking, but that's what edits are for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good advice. Hard to remember when the keyboard is smoking, but that&#8217;s what edits are for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Write a Salable Book or Novel: Part 1 – Identify Your Audience by Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/2011/01/11/how-to-write-a-salable-book-or-novel-part-1-%e2%80%93-identify-your-audience/#comment-4778</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/?p=28#comment-4778</guid>
		<description>Great points! Knowing your audience might be the difference between rejection and an acceptance in anything you send out. Even if something is written well, it could get 'the hook'(think old time Vaudville or Looney Toons cartoons- when something didn't work they were pulled off-stage with an old hook) if the audience isn't the right one.

One way of making sure that you target the right audience is to take time to read the Submission Guidelines of any market you intend to submit to...and I would also recommend reading a few stories (esp. online sites) to determine what their preferences might be.

 You're also trying to appeal to someone's personal taste (who ever reads the material) and life factors often apply....for example- you may have written a fantastic story/book about some flying pig with telepathic ablities that saves the world, but if the editor has recently lost his pet pig to Swine Flu, then you might just get a negative reaction. In writing, as in life, sometimes you're the windshield...sometimes your the bug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points! Knowing your audience might be the difference between rejection and an acceptance in anything you send out. Even if something is written well, it could get &#8216;the hook&#8217;(think old time Vaudville or Looney Toons cartoons- when something didn&#8217;t work they were pulled off-stage with an old hook) if the audience isn&#8217;t the right one.</p>
<p>One way of making sure that you target the right audience is to take time to read the Submission Guidelines of any market you intend to submit to&#8230;and I would also recommend reading a few stories (esp. online sites) to determine what their preferences might be.</p>
<p> You&#8217;re also trying to appeal to someone&#8217;s personal taste (who ever reads the material) and life factors often apply&#8230;.for example- you may have written a fantastic story/book about some flying pig with telepathic ablities that saves the world, but if the editor has recently lost his pet pig to Swine Flu, then you might just get a negative reaction. In writing, as in life, sometimes you&#8217;re the windshield&#8230;sometimes your the bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Surviving and Thriving the Changes in Book Publishing by Al Kalar</title>
		<link>http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/2010/08/03/surviving-and-thriving-the-changes-in-book-publishing/#comment-4734</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Kalar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/?p=872#comment-4734</guid>
		<description>PMoore: eBooks will survive and increase in market share. 

Economics drive things in the long run along with convenience. Home computers were poor stepchildren to paper, pencil, and typewriters in the '70s and no one thought they'd amount to anything. Today, the average laptop can run rings around any giant mainframe produced in the '70s and the average household has more than one computer in it (and so does your car -- under the hood).

eReaders can hold a library of over 1000 books. Classics are available free at Project Gutenberg. eBooks are generally less expensive than their paper counterparts and can be read within minutes of purchase, rather than paying freight and waiting days for your ordered book to arrive. And you don't have to travel to the nearest bookstore to find them.

Still, some (especially older readers) will continue to prefer paper books, but the technical generation (the ones who can walk, text, and chew gum at the same time) will prefer eBooks. No more heavy backpack full of school books. You can make notes on your e-version without destroying the underlying book. And their college texts should cost less (some sell for around $100 these days).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PMoore: eBooks will survive and increase in market share. </p>
<p>Economics drive things in the long run along with convenience. Home computers were poor stepchildren to paper, pencil, and typewriters in the &#8217;70s and no one thought they&#8217;d amount to anything. Today, the average laptop can run rings around any giant mainframe produced in the &#8217;70s and the average household has more than one computer in it (and so does your car &#8212; under the hood).</p>
<p>eReaders can hold a library of over 1000 books. Classics are available free at Project Gutenberg. eBooks are generally less expensive than their paper counterparts and can be read within minutes of purchase, rather than paying freight and waiting days for your ordered book to arrive. And you don&#8217;t have to travel to the nearest bookstore to find them.</p>
<p>Still, some (especially older readers) will continue to prefer paper books, but the technical generation (the ones who can walk, text, and chew gum at the same time) will prefer eBooks. No more heavy backpack full of school books. You can make notes on your e-version without destroying the underlying book. And their college texts should cost less (some sell for around $100 these days).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Surviving and Thriving the Changes in Book Publishing by PMoore</title>
		<link>http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/2010/08/03/surviving-and-thriving-the-changes-in-book-publishing/#comment-4733</link>
		<dc:creator>PMoore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/?p=872#comment-4733</guid>
		<description>I dont think that this ebook with survive all the long, i believe that paper back book is always is the past and the future the reason i believe this, is because every one will enjoy the feeling of opening a book and reading it, how is ebook consider a book when u can't enjoy the decades of tradition?.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think that this ebook with survive all the long, i believe that paper back book is always is the past and the future the reason i believe this, is because every one will enjoy the feeling of opening a book and reading it, how is ebook consider a book when u can&#8217;t enjoy the decades of tradition?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Six Most Common Grammar Errors Editors See by John Bowers</title>
		<link>http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/2010/10/26/the-six-most-common-grammar-errors-editors-see/#comment-4442</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/?p=1014#comment-4442</guid>
		<description>Couldn't agree more, Al, with one exception--literary license and a writer who know's what he's doing can start a sentence with "and" or "but" now and then with great effect. The problem is when it is overdone. Such license must be used sparingly, but a good storyteller knows how to do that.

Your own "violation" of the rule in the text is a good example of how it should be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more, Al, with one exception&#8211;literary license and a writer who know&#8217;s what he&#8217;s doing can start a sentence with &#8220;and&#8221; or &#8220;but&#8221; now and then with great effect. The problem is when it is overdone. Such license must be used sparingly, but a good storyteller knows how to do that.</p>
<p>Your own &#8220;violation&#8221; of the rule in the text is a good example of how it should be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Speech Tags: Ambiguous Connections by John Bowers</title>
		<link>http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/2010/09/21/speech-tags-ambiguous-connections/#comment-4295</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/?p=940#comment-4295</guid>
		<description>Well said. 

All mechanics aside, the main lesson here, in my opinion, is that nothing should pull the reader out of the story. The problems Keith describe are very common among beginning writers (and a surprising number of not-so-beginning wrtiers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. </p>
<p>All mechanics aside, the main lesson here, in my opinion, is that nothing should pull the reader out of the story. The problems Keith describe are very common among beginning writers (and a surprising number of not-so-beginning wrtiers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Check That Spell … check by Christine Lajoie Golden</title>
		<link>http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/2010/09/07/check-that-spell-%e2%80%a6-check/#comment-4229</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Lajoie Golden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akwbooks.com/authors/authorblog/blog/?p=918#comment-4229</guid>
		<description>Amen to that! I think one of the problems that might plague some writers (esp. those writing sci-fi) is the overwhelming desire to 'make up' words. Be it names, places, or things, your spell check just isn't going to help when your whole page is covered in bloody slashes. (guess they use red just like our teachers did back in school--it adds to the misery when mistakes glare back at you.)

One thing that might be useful is to include your word in your computer's dictionary. Even words that you create for your story can be misspelled. I had someone submit to me and spelled one of their own words three different ways in the ms. they sent me.  Of course I was brilliant enough to notice this (duh) and mentioned it to them in my reply.  Although I personally don't like stories that have too many made up words, since it just adds to the confusion of spelling and misspelling.

But like John said, just because it doesn't show up as a mistake on your screen doesn't mean you can claim the blue ribbon in the Spelling Bee. You may just have gotten the wrong word spelled correctly...their are two many weighs too knot get it write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to that! I think one of the problems that might plague some writers (esp. those writing sci-fi) is the overwhelming desire to &#8216;make up&#8217; words. Be it names, places, or things, your spell check just isn&#8217;t going to help when your whole page is covered in bloody slashes. (guess they use red just like our teachers did back in school&#8211;it adds to the misery when mistakes glare back at you.)</p>
<p>One thing that might be useful is to include your word in your computer&#8217;s dictionary. Even words that you create for your story can be misspelled. I had someone submit to me and spelled one of their own words three different ways in the ms. they sent me.  Of course I was brilliant enough to notice this (duh) and mentioned it to them in my reply.  Although I personally don&#8217;t like stories that have too many made up words, since it just adds to the confusion of spelling and misspelling.</p>
<p>But like John said, just because it doesn&#8217;t show up as a mistake on your screen doesn&#8217;t mean you can claim the blue ribbon in the Spelling Bee. You may just have gotten the wrong word spelled correctly&#8230;their are two many weighs too knot get it write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

